Melhores alternativas de Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB em 2025
Procurando alternativas ao Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB? Nesta comparação, examinamos mais de perto o Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB juntamente com soluções de software semelhantes, incluindo Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU, Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU e Microsoft SQL Server 2008.
Nossa tabela comparativa detalhada destaca os principais recursos, preços e desempenho dessas soluções líderes, ajudando você a tomar uma decisão informada. Se você está em busca de funcionalidades robustas, design amigável ou alternativas econômicas, veja como Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU, Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU e Microsoft SQL Server 2008 se comparam para encontrar o software ideal para seus objetivos.
Database Size Limit
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB
|
Supports up to 10 GB maximum database size. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU
|
Supports up to 4 GB maximum database size. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB
|
Supports up to 10 GB maximum database size. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU
|
Has size limitations suitable for small to medium-sized applications. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2008
|
Supports larger databases, e.g., up to 50 GB. |
Deployment Model and Footprint
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB
|
Lightweight version; easy local deployment for development and testing with smaller footprint. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU
|
Small footprint; easy deployment with no service installation required; used for small-scale databases. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB
|
Lightweight and easy-to-use local database engine suitable for development purposes. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU
|
Small file size; supports private and shared deployment models; efficient storage for desktop and mobile apps. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2008
|
Full relational database management system requiring significant hardware resources; enterprise-grade deployments. |
Intended Usage and Scalability
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB
|
Designed for development and testing purposes with limited features; not recommended for production environments. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU
|
Designed for small-scale, desktop, and light applications with limited scalability. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB
|
Intended for small-scale applications and development purposes with some limitations on features and support. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU
|
Suitable for small to medium-sized applications including mobile apps; has performance constraints under heavy workloads. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2008
|
Supports large amounts of data and enterprise-level workloads with advanced security, business intelligence, and disaster recovery features. |
Escolher o software certo não é só sobre funcionalidades. Tamanho, tipo de licença, avaliações de usuários e popularidade também contam.
Esta comparação rápida mostra como Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB se compara com Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU, Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU e Microsoft SQL Server 2008 nesses aspectos, ajudando você a encontrar a melhor alternativa.
Tamanho
Licença
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB
|
Comercial |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU
|
Comercial |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB
|
Comercial |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU
|
Comercial |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2008
|
Comercial |