Las mejores alternativas Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB en 2025
¿Buscas alternativas a Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB? En esta comparación, analizamos más de cerca Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB junto con soluciones de software similares como Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU, Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU y Microsoft SQL Server 2008.
Nuestra tabla comparativa detallada destaca las características clave, precios y rendimiento de estas soluciones líderes, para que puedas tomar una decisión informada. Ya sea que busques una funcionalidad sólida, un diseño fácil de usar o alternativas rentables, explora cómo se comparan Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU, Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU y Microsoft SQL Server 2008 para encontrar el software perfecto para tus objetivos.
Database Size Limit
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB
|
Supports up to 10 GB maximum database size. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU
|
Supports up to 4 GB maximum database size. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB
|
Supports up to 10 GB maximum database size. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU
|
Has size limitations suitable for small to medium-sized applications. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2008
|
Supports larger databases, e.g., up to 50 GB. |
Deployment Model and Footprint
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB
|
Lightweight version; easy local deployment for development and testing with smaller footprint. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU
|
Small footprint; easy deployment with no service installation required; used for small-scale databases. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB
|
Lightweight and easy-to-use local database engine suitable for development purposes. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU
|
Small file size; supports private and shared deployment models; efficient storage for desktop and mobile apps. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2008
|
Full relational database management system requiring significant hardware resources; enterprise-grade deployments. |
Intended Usage and Scalability
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB
|
Designed for development and testing purposes with limited features; not recommended for production environments. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU
|
Designed for small-scale, desktop, and light applications with limited scalability. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB
|
Intended for small-scale applications and development purposes with some limitations on features and support. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU
|
Suitable for small to medium-sized applications including mobile apps; has performance constraints under heavy workloads. |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2008
|
Supports large amounts of data and enterprise-level workloads with advanced security, business intelligence, and disaster recovery features. |
Elegir el software adecuado no se trata solo de funciones. El tamaño, el tipo de licencia, las valoraciones de los usuarios y la popularidad también importan.
Esta comparación rápida muestra cómo se compara Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB con Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU, Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU y Microsoft SQL Server 2008 en estos aspectos clave, para ayudarte a encontrar la mejor alternativa.
Tamaño
Licencia
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB
|
Comercial |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU
|
Comercial |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB
|
Comercial |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU
|
Comercial |
![]() Microsoft SQL Server 2008
|
Comercial |