Les meilleures alternatives Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB à 2025
Vous recherchez des alternatives à Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB ? Dans cette comparaison, nous examinons de plus près Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB ainsi que des solutions logicielles similaires comme Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU, Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU et Microsoft SQL Server 2008.
Notre tableau comparatif détaillé met en évidence les principales fonctionnalités, les prix et les performances de ces solutions phares, vous permettant de prendre une décision éclairée. Que vous recherchiez une fonctionnalité robuste, une conception conviviale ou des alternatives économiques, découvrez comment Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU, Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU et Microsoft SQL Server 2008 se comparent pour trouver le logiciel idéal pour vos objectifs.
Database Size Limit
 Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB
|
Supports up to 10 GB maximum database size. |
 Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU
|
Supports up to 4 GB maximum database size. |
 Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB
|
Supports up to 10 GB maximum database size. |
 Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU
|
Has size limitations suitable for small to medium-sized applications. |
 Microsoft SQL Server 2008
|
Supports larger databases, e.g., up to 50 GB. |
Deployment Model and Footprint
|
Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB
|
Lightweight version; easy local deployment for development and testing with smaller footprint. |
|
Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU
|
Small footprint; easy deployment with no service installation required; used for small-scale databases. |
|
Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB
|
Lightweight and easy-to-use local database engine suitable for development purposes. |
|
Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU
|
Small file size; supports private and shared deployment models; efficient storage for desktop and mobile apps. |
|
Microsoft SQL Server 2008
|
Full relational database management system requiring significant hardware resources; enterprise-grade deployments. |
Intended Usage and Scalability
|
Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB
|
Designed for development and testing purposes with limited features; not recommended for production environments. |
|
Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU
|
Designed for small-scale, desktop, and light applications with limited scalability. |
|
Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB
|
Intended for small-scale applications and development purposes with some limitations on features and support. |
|
Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU
|
Suitable for small to medium-sized applications including mobile apps; has performance constraints under heavy workloads. |
|
Microsoft SQL Server 2008
|
Supports large amounts of data and enterprise-level workloads with advanced security, business intelligence, and disaster recovery features. |
Choisir le bon logiciel ne se résume pas aux fonctionnalités. La taille, le type de licence, les avis des utilisateurs et la popularité comptent aussi.
Ce comparatif rapide montre comment Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB se positionne face à Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU, Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB, Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU et Microsoft SQL Server 2008 sur ces points clés pour vous aider à choisir la meilleure alternative.
Taille
Licence
|
Microsoft SQL Server 2016 LocalDB
|
Commercial |
|
Microsoft SQL Server Compact x64 ENU
|
Commercial |
|
Microsoft SQL Server 2012 Express LocalDB
|
Commercial |
|
Microsoft SQL Server Compact SP2 ENU
|
Commercial |
|
Microsoft SQL Server 2008
|
Commercial |